Monthly Archives: December 2011 report positively on the merits of the Community Equipment Code of Practice

Posted on: 13/12/2011 | Categories: CECOPS General

Community Care, the respected journal for social care, has reported positively on the merits of the Code of Practice for Community Equipment.

Mithran Samuel, adults’ editor, writes:

If you haven’t already done so, it’s worth anyone working with disabled people checking out the new(ish) code of practice for providers of community equipment.

Despite an estimated four million people receiving 12 million pieces of equipment each year, and safety and quality issues being so important for service users, there is no system of regulation for community equipment. The code of practice is designed to fill this gap.

Equipment providers or commissioners are invited to become registered users of the code, which means that they self-monitor their performance against it, or accredited users, which means their standards are independently verified.

The organisation behind the code is the Community Equipment Code of Practice Community Interest Company. Registered or accredited users will get to carry an appropriate kitemark. Users will also gain access to training for their staff.

It sounds a good scheme, though there is obviously a cost attached for both registration and accreditation. The argument for providers is that it should show commissioners, users and others that you are worth buying equipment from. It will be interesting to see how well it takes off.

See the news item here 

Read More >

The Chartered Society of Physiotherapy urge their members to adopt the Community Equipment Code of Practice

Posted on: 12/12/2011 | Categories: CECOPS General

The Chartered Society of Physiotherapists (CSP) support the Community Equipment Code of Practice and urge their members to adopt it.

CSP has supported the need for Standards for community equipment for some time, and have been very involved in the work carried out by Brian Donnelly (CECOPS Director).

Leonie Dawson, CSP Professional Adviser (pictured opposite at the CECOPS launch, Kings Fund) said:

“The CSP has strongly supported the development of this code and physiotherapists involved in the provision of equipment to patients are urged to go to the website to register as users of the code.”


CECOPS welcome the backing of a professional and well respected organisation like CSP and believe this is a “big step forward for ensuring the Code is widely adopted.”

Interestingly, the Code of Practice is to be taught to all professionals involved with community equipment at various Universities across the UK from March 2012.

Read More >

PRESS RELEASE: Code of Practice for Community Equipment launches

Posted on: 05/12/2011 | Categories: CECOPS General

First Code of Practice launches to improve community equipment services for disabled children and adults

The first ever Code of Practice for community and other disability equipment has been launched in the UK in response to a series of critical reviews identifying serious clinical and financial failings.[1]

The Code aims to support public sector organisations to help them commission and provide services more effectively.

Incredibly, until now there has been no standardised regulation of a service area that supplies over 12 million pieces of equipment to 4 million people every year in the UK.

A recent report has identified that if just 1% of community equipment fails to be delivered, the potential cost to the economy could reach an alarming £5 billion per annum. [2]  

According to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) [3] every year in the UK there are over 30 deaths and 1,500 serious incidents as a result of inappropriate and unsafe equipment supplied in the community.

The Code of Practice will be administered by a not-for-profit social enterprise, the Chairman of which is the former Chairman of the Disability Rights Commission, Sir Bert Massie CBE.

Sir Bert says: “Community equipment is a life saver for hundreds of thousands of people in the UK and is used every day in homes, hospitals, care homes, day centres and special schools.

“This is about providing the right equipment at the right time which supports initiatives related to self-determination, independence, rehabilitation, early intervention and prevention, together with end of life care.

 “The Code should be used everywhere where people use community equipment.”

 One of the main aims of the Code of Practice is to deliver better clinical outcomes by reducing the number of injuries, illnesses and fatalities caused by unsafe and inappropriate equipment, and by equipment that is delayed or in some cases not provided at all.

 Adherence to the Code will improve access to disability and community equipment for adults and children and make sure they’re getting the equipment they need in a timely manner.

Brian Donnelly is the author of the Code of Practice. He said: “Without community equipment or the correct community equipment, people are unable to live their lives as they should.

 “They may have to stay in hospital or require round-the-clock care provided by their Local Authority or even family members, which has significant economic and quality of life implications.

 “Other industries operating in the health and social care arenas have been regulated by codes of practice for decades, such as the pharmaceutical industry, and it’s long overdue for community equipment.

 “There are many fragments of legislation relating to the different aspects of these services, which are overly complex. The new Code pulls together all duties and responsibilities into one coherent document.”

The Code of Practice has received support from across the sectors including government agencies, third-sector organisations and professional bodies.

Although the Code is in its infancy The British Red Cross, seeing its benefits, has already signed up and pledged its support.

Jean Henderson, Red Cross UK Director, said: “The Red Cross believes that the high quality provision of community equipment plays a vital role in promoting physical and mental well-being and we welcome the introduction of the Community Equipment Code of Practice Scheme.” 

Sheila Brown OBE is Chief Executive of children’s charity Newlife and is also a non-executive director of the social enterprise that will administer the Code. Newlife funds children’s disability and complex equipment for families who have been unable to access equipment through the NHS and Local Authorities.

Sheila said: “At Newlife we hear hundreds of shocking and upsetting stories every year as a result of equipment not being provided, and we are regularly bailing out a system that is not working.

“For example, we found out recently about a Grandmother who had to shower her 13-year old grandson in a paddling pool in her garage because she couldn’t get the proper disability equipment she needed from her Local Authority.

“We know that budgets are tight but we just don’t believe that this sort of thing should be happening and we know that situations like this are occurring across the UK every day.”

Sheila welcomes the Code as a means to enable all sectors to meet the needs of disabled children as efficiently as possible.

The clinical and financial benefits of providing community equipment correctly have been heralded for some time[4] with The Audit Commission saying: “…community equipment provides good outcomes at a reduced cost. If a drug was discovered with a similar cost profile, it would be hailed as the wonder drug of the age[5].”

The Code of Practice also has the backing of Dr Peter Patel, Chief Executive of the South Birmingham Commissioning Group. Dr Patel is at the heart of the current changes taking place within the NHS in England, through his role within a commissioning group.

Against a backdrop of significant flux and change in primary care commissioning, Dr Patel believes there is huge potential for the Code to be incorporated into a new primary care-based commissioning model.

“It is likely that a new commissioning model will involve multidisciplinary teams including GPs, Practice and Community Nurses, and Therapists, and this is a recommendation outlined in the Code of Practice.

“Adherence to the Code would offer clinical and financial benefits for both patients and commissioners and l believe there is great potential for the Code to be integrated into primary care commissioning.”

The Code of Practice sets out standards, guidelines and best practice for each stage of the community equipment process and applies to all areas where community equipment is commissioned and provided by Health and Local Authorities. It comprehensively covers all public sector commissioning, provision and the clinical and professional responsibilities.

Organisations can register as working to the Code of Practice as a Full or Associate Registrant, depending on their level of involvement with community equipment.

In addition, to provide independent quality assurance, organisations have the option to become accredited by an external inspection body. Approved Training is also available to cover all aspects of the Code, with courses available for all staff working with community equipment, whether commissioning, providing, or managing a service, or for professionals assessing users’ needs.




Media contacts

For images, interviews with spokespeople or more information, please contact:

Lindsay Ephgrave

Lindsay Ephgrave PR Ltd

07540 399 976


Notes to editors

About the Code of Practice

The Code of Practice is a recently written handbook. It is essentially a quality framework for the procurement and provision of services. It is primarily aimed at services in England, but also applies to other parts of the UK, and beyond.

The Code of Practice is intended for: policy makers; GPs; commissioners; procurement officers; service users and carers; health and social care professionals; medical device technicians and trainers; regulators and auditors; students and academics; and all providers including community equipment stores, retailers, pharmacies, special schools, care homes, hospitals and third sector organisations.


CECOPS is the responsible ‘body’ for administering the Code of Practice. CECOPS is a not-for-profit organisation (Community Interest Company) set up with the purpose of making community disability equipment services safer, of better quality and much more efficient.

The vision of CECOPS is: ‘High quality and safe community equipment services being available and accessible to all who need them: children and adults who are disabled, the elderly; and to support the carers and professionals who provide services to them.’

About Community Equipment

Examples of equipment types:

  • home nursing, e.g. pressure relieving mattresses, ventilators
  • aids for daily living, e.g. shower chairs, kettle tippers
  • children’s equipment, e.g. postural support chairs
  • sensory impairment equipment, e.g. flashing doorbells
  • minor adaptations, e.g. ramps, grab rails
  • wheelchairs (short term)
  • communication aids
  • telecare, e.g. environmental aids.

Most community equipment is issued by integrated Local Authority and NHS stores, and more recently by retailers in England. Equipment is also provided by special schools, hospitals, care homes and third sector organisations.

There are approximately 12 million pieces of equipment delivered to 4 million service users in the UK every year, via NHS & social care

Good equipment provision:

  • improves early years development;
  • cuts unscheduled hospital admissions, and avoids crisis admissions to high cost services;
  • reduces length of hospital stay;
  • reduces ‘bed blocking’;
  • assists early intervention & prevention strategies, and
  • assists with funding of long term care.


[1]Audit Commission (2000). Fully Equipped. London: Audit Commission Publications. Audit Commission (2002). Audit Commission Update: Fully Equipped 2002: Assisting Independence. London: Audit Commission Publications. Audit Commission (2003). Services for disabled children: A review of services for disabled children and their families. London: Audit Commission Publications. Donnelly, B. (2009) The Need for National Minimum Standards: An independent review. Available at:

[2] Donnelly, B. (2009) The Need for National Minimum Standards: An independent review. Available at:


[4] Heywood, F. Turner, L. (2007) Better outcomes, lower costs. School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, on behalf of the Office for Disability Issues, Department for Work and Pensions.

[5] Audit Commission (2002). Audit Commission Update: Fully Equipped 2002: Assisting Independence. London: Audit Commission Publications.

Read More >